The Divided Self pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025
R.D. Laing, one of the best-known psychiatrists of modern times, was born in Glasgow in 1927 and graduated from Glasgow University as a doctor of medicine. In the 1960's he developed the argument that there may be a benefit in allowing acute mental and emotional turmoil in depth to go on and have its way, and that the outcome of such turmoil could have a positive value. He was the first to put such a stand to the test by establishing, with others, residences where persons could live and be free to let happen what will when the acute psychosis is given free rein, or where, at the very least, they receive no treatment they do not want. This work with the Philadelphia Association since 1964, together with his focus on disturbed and disturbing types of interaction in institutions, groups and families, has been both influential and continually controversial. R.D. Laing's writings range from books on social theory to verse, as well as numerous articles and reviews in scientific journals and the popular press. His publications are: The Divided Self, Self and Others, Interpersonal Perception (with H. Phillipson and A. Robin Lee), Reason and Violence (introduced by Jean-Paul Sartre), Sanity, Madness and the Family (with A. Esterson), The Politics of Experience and The Bird of Paradise, Knots, The Politics of the Family, The Facts of Life, Do You Love Me?, Conversations with Children, Sonnets, The Voice of Experience and Wisdom, Madness and Folly. R.D. Laing died in 1989. Anthony Clare, writing in the Guardian, said of him: "His major achievement was that he dragged the isolated and neglected inner world of the severely psychotic individual out of the back ward of the large gloomy mental hospital and on to the front pages of influential newspapers, journals and literary magazines... Everyone in contemporary psychiatry owes something to R.D. Laing."
- R.D.Laing
- psychopathology
Presenting case studies of schizophrenic patients, Laing aims to make madness and the process of going mad comprehensible. He also offe rs an existential analysis of personal alienation. Dr. Laing's first purpose is to make madness and the process of going mad comprehensible. In this, with case studies of schizophrenic patients, he succeeds brilliantly, but he does more: through a vision of sanity and madness as 'degrees of conjunction and disjunction between two persons where the one is sane by common consent' he offers a rich existential analysis of personal alienation.
The outsider, estranged from himself and society, cannot experience either himself or others as 'real'. He invents a false self and with it he confronts both the outside world and his own despair. The disintegration of his real self keeps pace with the growing unreality of his false self until, in the extremes of schizophrenic breakdown, the whole personality disintegrates.
具體描述
讀後感
我不知道有多痛可以造就如此的爱，我不知道有多累可以放射如此的激情。因为我始终依赖我的感官，逃离不出我的大脑皮层。试着闭上双眼，我给你的爱并不在这世间万物之中，敞开你那透明的心，用心来感触这炙热的爱，不要害怕，撕裂我的心，那里有你美丽的住所。
評分我不知道有多痛可以造就如此的爱，我不知道有多累可以放射如此的激情。因为我始终依赖我的感官，逃离不出我的大脑皮层。试着闭上双眼，我给你的爱并不在这世间万物之中，敞开你那透明的心，用心来感触这炙热的爱，不要害怕，撕裂我的心，那里有你美丽的住所。
評分我不知道有多痛可以造就如此的爱，我不知道有多累可以放射如此的激情。因为我始终依赖我的感官，逃离不出我的大脑皮层。试着闭上双眼，我给你的爱并不在这世间万物之中，敞开你那透明的心，用心来感触这炙热的爱，不要害怕，撕裂我的心，那里有你美丽的住所。
評分他想要自由，所以别人强迫他做的，他就不做；可是如果别人的目的正好是让他不做，他不做岂不是遂了别人的心意？那他做吧！如果别人知道他是这样想的话，故意强迫他做就是能达到别人的目的，那他还是不自由。天啊，他到底是自由还是不自由。这个时候他踏入了一个死循环，他到底...
評分这是一本对我影响很深的书，作者的才华与慈悲永远铭记在我的心里。 这本书是四年前我在网上看到的电子版，那时候我醉心于心理学，我觉的作者对人内在发现的成就的学术成就不亚于弗洛伊德。而人格成就更高。
用戶評價
常人：(self/body)⇆other；病人：self⇆(body/other)。 很欣賞Laing大膽的分析和理論構建。不知道一個真正的病人讀他的分析作何感想。貼切麼？閤理麼？我總覺得一兩個個例來支持理論是不閤適的。往好瞭說，也許醫生在大量接觸病人過程中培養齣瞭某種手到擒來的intuitions？往壞瞭說，用理論去套經驗是以蠡測海——概念的匱乏和經驗的多樣性是衝突的，psychotic experiences may not be generalized or theorized?
评分常人：(self/body)⇆other；病人：self⇆(body/other)。 很欣賞Laing大膽的分析和理論構建。不知道一個真正的病人讀他的分析作何感想。貼切麼？閤理麼？我總覺得一兩個個例來支持理論是不閤適的。往好瞭說，也許醫生在大量接觸病人過程中培養齣瞭某種手到擒來的intuitions？往壞瞭說，用理論去套經驗是以蠡測海——概念的匱乏和經驗的多樣性是衝突的，psychotic experiences may not be generalized or theorized?
评分常人：(self/body)⇆other；病人：self⇆(body/other)。 很欣賞Laing大膽的分析和理論構建。不知道一個真正的病人讀他的分析作何感想。貼切麼？閤理麼？我總覺得一兩個個例來支持理論是不閤適的。往好瞭說，也許醫生在大量接觸病人過程中培養齣瞭某種手到擒來的intuitions？往壞瞭說，用理論去套經驗是以蠡測海——概念的匱乏和經驗的多樣性是衝突的，psychotic experiences may not be generalized or theorized?
评分常人：(self/body)⇆other；病人：self⇆(body/other)。 很欣賞Laing大膽的分析和理論構建。不知道一個真正的病人讀他的分析作何感想。貼切麼？閤理麼？我總覺得一兩個個例來支持理論是不閤適的。往好瞭說，也許醫生在大量接觸病人過程中培養齣瞭某種手到擒來的intuitions？往壞瞭說，用理論去套經驗是以蠡測海——概念的匱乏和經驗的多樣性是衝突的，psychotic experiences may not be generalized or theorized?
评分常人：(self/body)⇆other；病人：self⇆(body/other)。 很欣賞Laing大膽的分析和理論構建。不知道一個真正的病人讀他的分析作何感想。貼切麼？閤理麼？我總覺得一兩個個例來支持理論是不閤適的。往好瞭說，也許醫生在大量接觸病人過程中培養齣瞭某種手到擒來的intuitions？往壞瞭說，用理論去套經驗是以蠡測海——概念的匱乏和經驗的多樣性是衝突的，psychotic experiences may not be generalized or theorized?
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有