Landscape designer Gilles Clement and architect Philippe Rahm present their contrasting visions through installations created specifically for the Canadian Centre for Architecture. Gilles Clement advances his theory of abandoned and overlooked spaces in cities and the possibilities they offer to sustain biological diversity in the future. Philippe Rahm proposes a new way to address the use of energy in architecture and raises the possibility that climate can replace typology, function, and spatial form in determining the way we use and define architecture. Giovanna Borasi situates the opposing positions of Clement and Rahm within a larger cultural context, and opens a new discussion on the place of humans in relation to the environment.
評分
評分
評分
評分
"form and function follow climate"是個很雞賊的position. Rahm看重rhetoric, 很多決策是surrealism driven, 而非基於測算.There is more aesthetic consequence than the architectural one.
评分"form and function follow climate"是個很雞賊的position. Rahm看重rhetoric, 很多決策是surrealism driven, 而非基於測算.There is more aesthetic consequence than the architectural one.
评分"form and function follow climate"是個很雞賊的position. Rahm看重rhetoric, 很多決策是surrealism driven, 而非基於測算.There is more aesthetic consequence than the architectural one.
评分"form and function follow climate"是個很雞賊的position. Rahm看重rhetoric, 很多決策是surrealism driven, 而非基於測算.There is more aesthetic consequence than the architectural one.
评分"form and function follow climate"是個很雞賊的position. Rahm看重rhetoric, 很多決策是surrealism driven, 而非基於測算.There is more aesthetic consequence than the architectural one.
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有