Following the death of Elizabeth Siddal in 1862 and his settling in Chelsea, Rossetti entered on a period of his life -- charted in volume 3 -- that was marked by renewed activity as a painter and increased financial prosperity. The years 1868-1870 covered by volume 4 culminate in his return to writing poetry and the publication in June 1870 of his long-anticipated and widely-read Poems. However, despite the satisfaction that he could take from his standing as a painter and from the fact that he was about to establish himself as a poet, 1868-1870 were troubled years for Rossetti. Problems with his eyesight led him to give up painting for long periods, and to fear that, like his father before him, he would end his days blind. He consulted Sir William Bowman and other leading ophthalmologists, who eased his mind sufficiently for him to return to his easel. This was also the time when he declared his love for Jane Morris, the wife of his long-time friend and admirer William Morris. In his long, moving letters to Janey we come face to face with the satisfactions and frustrations of their relationship. The letters to Janey provide a context for understanding the many paintings and drawings from this period for which she was the model, and for gauging the biographical origins of the sonnets, written at this time for the sequence, The House of Life, an early version of which was included in Poems.Probably the most rewarding letters in the volume concern the preparation of Poems. The letters deal at length with Rossetti's decision to have his poems typeset for distribution to friends, the exhumation of Elizabeth Siddal's coffin to recover the manuscript of his poems, his obsessive care over the physical appearance of the volume, especially the binding , and his efforts at "working the oracle," William Bell Scott's description of his methodically lining up sympathetic reviewers.As with all of Rossetti's correspondence, the letters in volume 4 are replete with pointed and sometimes humorous commentary on an array of people and events, ranging from Edward Burne-Jones's affair with "the Greek damzel," Mary Zambaco, and Frederick Sandys's appropriation of subjects from his pictures, to his unease over Swinburne's uncontrollable drunkenness, and his ominous hatred of Robert Buchanan, the author of the "Fleshly School" attack on his poetry in the Contemporary Review of October 1871, which became a major cause of the disastrous events of the years 1871-1872.
评分
评分
评分
评分
坦率地说,刚开始翻阅这卷帙浩繁的通信集时,我曾有些许畏惧,担心它会变成枯燥的学术资料堆砌。然而,我的担忧完全是多余的。这套书的编辑工作堪称教科书级别的典范——他们没有试图去“美化”历史,而是以一种近乎残酷的诚实,呈现了罗塞蒂生活的原貌。那种未经修饰的、私密性极强的语言,充满了那个时代特有的优雅与粗粝并存的语感。我特别留意了其中关于他对《博涅的诅咒》早期构思的探讨,那些关于色彩运用和象征主义的辩论,简直是一场场微型的美学讲座。透过这些书信,我们得以窥见这位大诗人在面对公众质疑和个人理想的冲突时,是如何在自我怀疑与坚定的艺术信念之间反复拉扯的。这种动态的、成长的视角,比任何定论性的评论都要来得鲜活和富有启迪性。它迫使读者跳出后世赋予他的“殉道者”或“享乐主义者”的标签,重新审视那个复杂多面的天才形象。
评分这本书最让我感到震撼的,是它揭示了“艺术圈”内部那种微妙的权力平衡和情感纠葛。罗塞蒂与威廉·莫里斯、爱德华·伯恩-琼斯之间的友谊,在信件中展现出的那种既是竞争对手又是彼此精神支柱的复杂关系,极其引人入胜。这些通信录不仅仅是文学史的佐证,它们更像是一部关于友谊、嫉妒与艺术合作的社会心理学报告。比如,当涉及到对某一特定主题的处理方式出现分歧时,信件里那种克制却又暗流涌动的措辞,比任何公开的争吵都更具杀伤力。它让你意识到,伟大的艺术往往诞生于如此密集、如此充满人性的微小冲突之中。我尤其喜欢那些关于如何挑选模特、如何与画廊主周旋的琐碎记录,这些“幕后花絮”极大地丰富了我们对那个时代艺术家日常生活的理解,打破了“天才”高高在上、不食人间烟火的刻板印象。
评分从装帧和排版的角度来看,这套书的呈现方式也体现出对原件的极大尊重。每一次翻页,都像是在进行一次考古挖掘。那些对于手稿细节的详尽注释和脚注,虽然数量庞大,但它们的功能性是无可替代的——它们填补了作为旁观者的我们与十九世纪背景之间的鸿沟。我注意到一个有趣的现象,那就是罗塞蒂在书信中对“时间”这个概念的处理方式:时而感到时间流逝的缓慢,时而又对创作的紧迫感感到恐慌。这种对时间感知的波动,精准地捕捉了一个创作型人格的内在节奏。对于那些对文献学或文本考证感兴趣的读者来说,这本书提供的原始材料是无价之宝。它不仅仅是阅读,更是一种近距离接触历史原件、感受墨水干涸之痕迹的体验,这种深度体验是任何数字版本都无法替代的,它让我们对“真实性”有了更深层次的思考。
评分阅读这套书的过程,与其说是阅读历史,不如说是一种与已故智者的深度对话。你无法逃避罗塞蒂的目光,他透过那些陈旧的文字,直接审视着你的理解力与共情能力。我发现自己常常停下来,反复揣摩某个句子背后的真实意图——他是否真的相信自己所说的?他又在向谁隐藏了什么?特别是在他与简·莫里斯关系变得复杂之后,那些关于情感和道德困境的描述,充满了痛苦的诗意。这套书的价值在于,它拒绝提供简单的答案或明确的道德评判,而是将所有的证据和情感的碎片呈现在你面前,让你自己去拼凑和裁决。这使得每一次重读都会有新的发现,仿佛每一次都能从这位艺术巨匠的心灵深处汲取到一些关于如何面对生活中的“未完成”和“不可言说”的勇气。它是一部关于爱、艺术、以及如何与自身的局限性共存的宏大史诗。
评分这套书简直是文学爱好者不容错过的瑰宝,它以一种近乎刺痛的细腻,将我们带回了维多利亚时代那片充满激情与挣扎的艺术土壤。我尤其欣赏作者在梳理那些信件往来时所展现出的那种深邃的历史洞察力。你仿佛能闻到十九世纪伦敦空气中弥漫着的煤烟味和油墨香,耳边萦绕着斯威本那特有的、近乎狂热的辩论声。更令人着迷的是,那些信件并非仅仅是事件的记录,它们是心跳的誊本,是灵魂深处的独白。读着它们,你会清晰地感受到达丁·加布里埃尔·罗塞蒂在创作高潮与个人情感低谷之间的剧烈摆动。他对待缪斯女神的近乎宗教般虔诚,以及他对艺术形式近乎偏执的追求,都通过那些泛黄的纸页跃然纸上。每一封信函,无论内容是关于诗歌的只言片语,还是对一幅未完成画作的懊恼,都像是一面棱镜,折射出整个前拉斐尔派运动的复杂性与内在张力。这种深度挖掘,远超出了任何一本标准的传记所能提供的表面叙述,它给予的是一种沉浸式的、近乎参与历史的体验。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有