Tom Sparrow is Visiting Instructor in the Department of Philosophy at Slippery Rock University, PA. He is the author of Plastic Bodies: Rebuilding Sensation After Phenomenology (with a foreword by Catherine Malabou), forthcoming with Open Humanities Press. He has contributed to a number of established philosophy journals.
In the 20th century, phenomenology promised a method that would get philosophy "back to the things themselves". But phenomenology has always been haunted by the spectre of an anthropocentric antirealism.
Tom Sparrow shows how, in the 21st century, speculative realism aims to do what phenomenology could not: provide a philosophical method that disengages the human-centred approach to metaphysics in order to chronicle the complex realm of nonhuman reality.
Through a focused reading of the methodological statements and metaphysical commitments of key phenomenologists and speculative realists, Sparrow shows how speculative realism is replacing phenomenology as the beacon of realism in contemporary Continental philosophy.
通过一番论述,zahavi说了这么一句话: It is not clear how Sparrow can reconcile the claim that phenomenology has no method, that it has a transcendental method that prohibits metaphysical commitments, and that its method commits it to idealism, but given his...
评分通过一番论述,zahavi说了这么一句话: It is not clear how Sparrow can reconcile the claim that phenomenology has no method, that it has a transcendental method that prohibits metaphysical commitments, and that its method commits it to idealism, but given his...
评分通过一番论述,zahavi说了这么一句话: It is not clear how Sparrow can reconcile the claim that phenomenology has no method, that it has a transcendental method that prohibits metaphysical commitments, and that its method commits it to idealism, but given his...
评分通过一番论述,zahavi说了这么一句话: It is not clear how Sparrow can reconcile the claim that phenomenology has no method, that it has a transcendental method that prohibits metaphysical commitments, and that its method commits it to idealism, but given his...
评分通过一番论述,zahavi说了这么一句话: It is not clear how Sparrow can reconcile the claim that phenomenology has no method, that it has a transcendental method that prohibits metaphysical commitments, and that its method commits it to idealism, but given his...
speculative realism,Object-oriented ontology; 很好的提醒.批评文章:Dan Zahavi, 2016. The end of what?: Phenomenology vs. Speculative realism; Andrea Zhow: Phenomenological ontology and practical reason: a response to Merlassoux's After Finitude
评分speculative realism,Object-oriented ontology; 很好的提醒.批评文章:Dan Zahavi, 2016. The end of what?: Phenomenology vs. Speculative realism; Andrea Zhow: Phenomenological ontology and practical reason: a response to Merlassoux's After Finitude
评分speculative realism,Object-oriented ontology; 很好的提醒.批评文章:Dan Zahavi, 2016. The end of what?: Phenomenology vs. Speculative realism; Andrea Zhow: Phenomenological ontology and practical reason: a response to Merlassoux's After Finitude
评分speculative realism,Object-oriented ontology; 很好的提醒.批评文章:Dan Zahavi, 2016. The end of what?: Phenomenology vs. Speculative realism; Andrea Zhow: Phenomenological ontology and practical reason: a response to Merlassoux's After Finitude
评分speculative realism,Object-oriented ontology; 很好的提醒.批评文章:Dan Zahavi, 2016. The end of what?: Phenomenology vs. Speculative realism; Andrea Zhow: Phenomenological ontology and practical reason: a response to Merlassoux's After Finitude
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有