Philip G. Roeder is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of California, San Diego. He is author of Soviet Political Dynamics: Development of the First Leninist Polity (Harper & Row).
Why did the Soviet system fail? How is it that a political order, born of revolution, perished from stagnation? What caused a seemingly stable polity to collapse? Philip Roeder finds the answer to these questions in the Bolshevik "constitution"--the fundamental rules of the Soviet system that evolved from revolutionary times into the post-Stalin era. These rules increasingly prevented the Communist party from responding to the immense social changes that it had itself set in motion: although the Soviet political system initially had vast resources for transforming society, its ability to transform itself became severely limited.
In Roeder's view, the problem was not that Soviet leaders did not attempt to change, but that their attempts were so often defeated by institutional resistance to reform. The leaders' successful efforts to stabilize the political system reduced its adaptability, and as the need for reform continued to mount, stability became a fatal flaw. Roeder's analysis of institutional constraints on political behavior represents a striking departure from the biographical approach common to other analyses of Soviet leadership, and provides a strong basis for comparison of the Soviet experience with constitutional transformation in other authoritarian polities.
評分
評分
評分
評分
蘇聯曆史讀起來總是很有興味的,結閤十幾年後更完備的理論解讀更是如此。部委的官僚與上麵的政客以及中央委員會與政治局關係寫得比較好。
评分蘇聯曆史讀起來總是很有興味的,結閤十幾年後更完備的理論解讀更是如此。部委的官僚與上麵的政客以及中央委員會與政治局關係寫得比較好。
评分蘇聯曆史讀起來總是很有興味的,結閤十幾年後更完備的理論解讀更是如此。部委的官僚與上麵的政客以及中央委員會與政治局關係寫得比較好。
评分蘇聯曆史讀起來總是很有興味的,結閤十幾年後更完備的理論解讀更是如此。部委的官僚與上麵的政客以及中央委員會與政治局關係寫得比較好。
评分蘇聯曆史讀起來總是很有興味的,結閤十幾年後更完備的理論解讀更是如此。部委的官僚與上麵的政客以及中央委員會與政治局關係寫得比較好。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有