Summary This book brings together many of the world's leading open access experts to provide an analysis of the key strategic, technical and economic aspects on the topic of open access. Open access to research papers is perhaps a defining debate for publishers, librarians, university managers and many researchers within the international academic community. Starting with a description of the current situation and its shortcomings, this book then defines the varieties of open access and addresses some of the many misunderstandings to which the term sometimes gives rise. There are chapters on the technologies involved, researchers' perspectives, and the business models of key players. These issues are then illustrated in a series of case studies from around the world, including the USA, UK, Netherlands, Australia and India. Key Features 1. Chapters by leading experts in the field, including Professor Jean-Claude Guédon, Clifford Lynch, Stevan Harnad, Peter Suber, Charles Bailey, Jr., Alma Swan, Fred Friend, John Shipp and Leo Waaijers 2. Discussion of open access from a wide range of perspectives 3. Country case studies, summarising open access in the USA, UK, Netherlands, Australia and India Readership This book will be of interest to anyone involved in the communication of academic research, including publishers, librarians, university managers, learned societies, research funders and academics. Contents Part 1: Open Access - History, Definitions and Rationale Overview of scholarly communication - Alma Swan (Key Perspectives Ltd., UK) What is open access? - Charles W. Bailey, Jr. (University of Houston, USA) Open access: a symptom and a promise - Jean-Claude Guédon (University of Montreal, Canada) Economic costs of toll access - Andrew Odlyzko (University of Minnesota, USA) The impact loss to authors and research - Michael Kurtz (Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, USA) and Tim Brody (University of Southampton) The technology of open access - Chris Awre (University of Hull, UK) Part 2: Open Access and Researchers The culture of open access: researchers' views and responses - Alma Swan (Key Perspectives Ltd., UK) Opening access by overcoming Zeno's paralysis - Steven Harnad (Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada, and University of Southampton, UK) Researchers and institutional repositories - Arthur Sale (University of Tasmania, Australia) Part 3: Open Access and Other Participants Open access to the research literature: a funder's perspective - Robert Terry (Wellcome Trust, UK) and Robert Kiley (Wellcome Library, UK) Business models in open access publishing - Matthew Cockerill (BioMed Central, UK) Learned society business models and open access - Mary Waltham (Publishing Consultant, USA) Open all hours? Institutional models for open access - Colin Steele (Emeritus Fellow, ANU, Australia) Part 4: The Position Around the World DARE also means dare: institutional repository status in the Netherlands as of early 2006 - Leo Waaijers (DARE Programme, the Netherlands) Open access in the USA - Peter Suber (Earlham College, USA) Towards open access to UK research - Frederick J. Friend (Scholarly Consultant, JISC, UK, and Honorary Director of Scholarly Communication, UCL, UK) Open access in Australia - John Shipp (University of Sydney, Australia) Open access in India - D. K. Sahu (Consultant Paediatrician and CEO Medknow Publications, India) and Ramesh C. Parmar (Consulting Paediatric Cardiologist, India) Part 5: The Future Open competition: beyond human reader-centric views of scholarly literatures - Clifford Lynch (Coalition of Networked Information, USA) The open research web - Nigel Shadbolt, Tim Brody, Les Carr (University of Southampton, UK) and Steven Harnad (Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada, and University of Southampton, UK) Links, bibliography, index
评分
评分
评分
评分
如果要用一个词来形容阅读此书的感受,那便是“思维的重构”。在接触这本书之前,我习惯性地将“学术成果”与“昂贵的订阅费”画上等号,潜意识里接受了知识的稀缺性逻辑。然而,作者通过一系列清晰的逻辑推演和数据支撑,彻底颠覆了我的认知框架。书中对“阅读权”与“贡献权”的辩证分析尤其发人深省。作者提出,当我们习惯于付费阅读时,实际上也默认了我们作为研究贡献者不应享有自由传播成果的权利。这种对学术价值链中权力分配的重新审视,让我对“谁为知识付费”这个问题有了更深刻的反思。这本书的语言风格偏向于理性思辨,逻辑链条严密,层层递进,没有一句废话,每一个论点都有其坚实的支撑点,读完后,感觉自己的知识体系经过了一次彻底的“去中心化”改造,对于如何更有效地参与到全球知识共享的浪潮中,心中已经有了明确的方向和坚定的信念。
评分对于我这种侧重于跨学科研究的读者来说,本书最大的价值在于其构建了一个极其完善的、可操作的知识生态系统蓝图。它不是空谈理论,而是提供了一整套从基础建设到长期维护的实施路径。例如,书中详细比较了不同类型的预印本服务器(如arXiv、bioRxiv)在不同学科的适应性,并针对如何建立和管理机构级的开放获取存储库给出了详尽的步骤指南,包括预算估算、技术选型(从DSpace到Fedora的选择)、以及社区推广策略。这些内容对于真正想要推动所在机构实现开放转型的管理者来说,简直就是一本实操手册。更难能可贵的是,作者没有忽视小型研究机构和独立学者的需求,书中专门辟出一章讨论如何在预算极度有限的情况下,利用现有开源工具和社区资源建立起一套可持续的本地化开放平台。这种兼顾宏观战略和微观执行的写作方式,使得本书超越了一般的理论探讨,成为了一份极具前瞻性和实用价值的行动纲领。
评分翻开这本书的时候,我原本是抱着一种“凑合看看”的心态,毕竟“开放获取”这个话题听起来多少有点学术论文的枯燥感,但很快,我发现自己彻底被作者的叙事风格所吸引住了。这本书读起来完全不像一本硬邦邦的理论专著,它更像是一部由多位行业先驱口述历史串联起来的精彩故事集。作者极其擅长运用生动的语言和富有画面感的描述来刻画那些在学术出版界掀起变革的“叛逆者”和创新者。我尤其喜欢其中关于早期“布达佩斯开放获取倡议”的那些轶事,那些充满激情与碰撞的会议场景,仿佛让我置身其中,感受到了那种“我们正在改变世界”的澎湃力量。叙事节奏的把控非常到位,在讲述技术标准和元数据规范这些略显晦涩的内容时,作者总能及时穿插一些引人入胜的个人访谈或小型案例研究,使得阅读体验一气呵成,毫无滞涩。它成功地将一个看似专业的领域,转化为了一部引人入胜的、关于信息解放的现代史诗,让人在获取知识的同时,也享受到了阅读的纯粹乐趣。
评分这本书在探讨开放获取实践所面临的现实阻力时,展现出一种近乎残酷的诚实。它没有一味地歌颂开放获取的种种美好,而是非常坦率地揭示了其内部的张力与外部的挑战。我印象最深的是其中关于“掠夺性期刊”(Predatory Journals)的章节,作者对此进行了前所未有的深入剖析,不仅列举了辨别这些“学术吸血鬼”的实用技巧,更重要的是,它探讨了为什么这些低劣的出版渠道会在资源匮乏的地区滋生和蔓延,这背后反映的是对发表需求的巨大缺口和监管机制的滞后。这种对问题的深度挖掘,避免了将开放获取简单化为“免费即是万能药”的肤浅认知。此外,书中对知识产权律师和出版商的反应,也描绘得栩栩如生,那种传统利益集团的焦虑、抵制和策略性妥协,被作者冷静地解构,让我们明白,这场变革的阻力并非来自观念的落后,而是根深蒂固的商业模式的防御。这种不偏不倚、多方审视的态度,让这本书的论述力量倍增,极具说服力。
评分这本《Open Access》简直是为我这种信息渴求者量身定做的,它像一把精准的钥匙,打开了知识的宝库大门,让我这个常年与付费墙抗争的自由研究者倍感振奋。我尤其欣赏作者在论述“开放获取”的伦理基础时所展现出的深度和广度。书中不仅罗列了各种开放获取的模式——从黄金、绿色到混合型,分析了它们各自的优缺点和实施障碍,更重要的是,它深入挖掘了这场运动背后的哲学思辨。作者并没有止步于技术层面或政策倡议,而是巧妙地将知识的自由流动与社会公平、教育普及这些宏大命题联系起来。例如,对于发展中国家学者获取前沿研究成果的困境,书中描绘的案例令人触目惊心,那种文字的张力仿佛能让人感受到屏幕另一端研究人员的无助与渴望。在评估不同机构库的有效性时,作者所引用的数据详实可靠,从全球范围内的机构参与度到特定学科领域的引用率变化,都进行了细致的对比分析,这种严谨性让人对书中的结论深信不疑。读完之后,我感觉自己不仅仅是了解了一种新的文献获取方式,更是参与了一场关于知识产权和学术自由的深刻对话,对未来学术生态的走向有了更为清晰的预判。
评分2013.08.08
评分2013.08.08
评分2013.08.08
评分2013.08.08
评分2013.08.08
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有