His personal relationships had failed. His career tracks had dead-ended. Now his health was threatened. Neale Donald Walsch, at age 48, was financially destitute and in a state of chronic depression. From this low place of frustration and desperation, Neale vented his ire by writing an angry letter to God on a yellow legal pad. At the end of an almost hysterical writing frenzy, near physical and emotional collapse, he was unable to release the pen from his hand. He heard a voice over his right shoulder, a real voice that frightened him. Then the voice moved inside Neale's voice head, and he wrote what the voice said. "Neale, do you really want answers to all these questions, or are you just venting?aWhat had begun as a private process in February 1992 thus became a dialog with an infinite source, which Neale later identified as a conversation with God."Conversations with God," the movie, is the dramatic story of Neale Donald Walsh's passage from being poor and homeless to becoming the messenger of spiritual truths that have impacted people worldwide. Book One of the "Conversations with God" series stayed on the "New York Times" Bestseller list for more than two and a half years and has been translated into 36 languages, with more than 7 million copies sold.A decade after the appearance of Book One, "Conversations with God," the movie, began shooting November 7, 2005, in Ashland, Oregon, where the actual events of Neale's transformation occurred. Finally, the full back story of Neale's struggle is revealed in a feature-length film produced and directed by Stephen Simon, who is responsible for such spiritual cinema classics as "Somewhere in Time" and What Dreams May Come and for the launch of of the modern-day spiritual cinema movement."Conversations with God: The Making of the Movie" provides a unique and exclusive insight into the process and personalities involved in the spiritually relevant film genre that has become known as spiritual cinema. The narrative text connects the film's storyline to the remarkable synchronistic events that linked all cast and crewmembers. From pre-production to the location sets, in more than 200 full-color production stills, production design works of art, and frames from the movie itself, here is the heart of filmmakers at work.And since Neale Donald Walsch lived these dramatic movie events, who better to comment on them from the personal depth of his experience? Throughout the book, Neale adds a commentary dimension unprecedented in moviemaking literature.All this combines to make "Conversations with God: The Making of the Movie" a touchstone document in the evolution of conscious moviemaking now recognized as spiritual cinema.
评分
评分
评分
评分
从文学性的角度来看,这本书的语言运用简直令人叹为观止,它仿佛在玩弄文字的边界。我注意到作者非常偏爱使用那种充满悖论和反讽意味的句子,让你在刚理解了某个概念的A面后,立刻被其B面所颠覆。比如,他描述“自由”时,可能用的词汇是“被限制的最大可能性”,这种表述本身就带有一种强烈的张力。更引人入胜的是,他对意象的选取极为古典而又现代。他能将宇宙的浩瀚与一片落叶的轨迹并置,然后用一种近乎诗歌的节奏将两者连接起来,其语言的密度之高,使得我不得不准备一本笔记本来逐字逐句地进行拆解。很多时候,我不是在阅读一个论点,而是在欣赏一段精心打磨的散文诗。这让我联想到一些早期的神秘主义文献,那种对语言工具的极致运用,试图超越日常交流的局限,去触碰那些“不可言说”的领域。每一次重读同一个段落,都会有新的体会,就好像光线以不同的角度照射同一块水晶,折射出不同的色彩光谱。这种文字的复杂性和多义性,是它最吸引人的地方,也是最让人望而生畏的地方。
评分我必须承认,这本书的结构和叙事节奏,简直是一场对现代读者耐心的严峻考验。它不像那些畅销的成功学读物那样,用清晰的标题、密集的要点和强劲的论证逻辑来牵引你。相反,它更像是一幅极其精细、细节繁复的文艺复兴时期油画,你必须站在足够远的距离,才能看清整体的构图和人物的联系,但若靠得太近,所有的笔触都会化为一团混沌的颜料。作者的行文风格极其跳跃,前一页还在讨论量子物理的某种不确定性原理,下一页可能就转到了对古代哲学中“道”的重新诠释,而这两者之间的过渡,完全依赖于读者自身的联想和经验的桥接。这种写作方式,使得阅读体验充满了主观的能动性,也带来了极大的挫败感。我多次合上书本,感到脑中思绪万千,却无法用任何一句简洁的话来概括“这本书到底说了什么”。它要求你摒弃线性思维,接受多维度的信息流同时涌入,然后自己去搭建起知识的星图。对于习惯了“输入-处理-输出”模式的读者而言,这无疑是一种挑战,但正是在这种挑战中,我体会到了一种久违的智力上的“搏斗”,迫使我的思维框架不得不进行某种程度上的重塑,去适应这种非线性的、充满暗示性的表达方式。
评分这本厚重的书籍,初拿到手时,那种油墨的清香混合着纸张的微涩,仿佛预示着一场漫长而深刻的旅程。我带着一种近乎朝圣般的心情翻开了扉页,期待着文字能如同清泉般涤荡我心中长久以来的困惑与迷茫。最初的几章,作者以一种近乎絮叨的、极其生活化的口吻展开叙述,仿佛是邻家大叔在壁炉旁,慢悠悠地讲述他最近观察到的世间百态。他并没有急于抛出什么宏大的理论,而是通过一系列细微的、近乎琐碎的日常片段——清晨透过窗帘缝隙的光线,邻居之间不经意的争执,或是雨后泥土散发出的那种湿润而复杂的味道——来构建他的观察基点。这种铺陈的手法,初看之下略显冗长,甚至会让人产生“这到底要讲到什么时候”的焦躁感。然而,当你真正沉下心来,不去追逐下一个高潮点,而是细细品味那些描摹日常的细腻笔触时,会发现一种奇异的共振。那些被我们习以为常、匆匆略过的瞬间,在作者的笔下被赋予了近乎神圣的意义。他似乎在用最朴素的语言,构建一个极度复杂的感知系统,让我们意识到,我们日常生活的每一个微小选择、每一次无意识的呼吸,都蕴含着某种宏大的、未被察觉的秩序。阅读的过程,与其说是吸收信息,不如说是一种“重新校准感官”的过程,强迫你放慢速度,去真正“看”见你周围的世界。
评分坦白说,对于那些追求快速答案和明确指令的读者来说,这本书可能会被视为一种“哲学上的噪音”。它拒绝提供任何简单的“如果……那么……”的公式。我记得有一次,我非常急切地想知道“如何处理愤怒这种情绪”,翻遍了几个章节,却只找到了一段关于“能量流动与阻碍”的模糊论述,完全没有针对性的心理调适技巧。这种“故作高深”的做法,一度让我非常恼火。但当我静下心来思考,或许作者的本意就是要打破这种“问题-解答”的机械循环。他更像是一个指引者,而非一个提供具体工具的工程师。他提供的不是螺丝刀,而是关于“建筑的本质”的深刻洞察。因此,这本书更像是伴侣,而不是工具书。你不能指望它在你需要时立刻解决问题,但它可以为你提供一个长期、稳定且深刻的参照系。它迫使你重新学习如何提问,如何从内心深处寻找解决方案,而不是依赖外部的权威或手册。它是一次漫长的心灵徒步,沿途风景未必总令人愉悦,但终点所能带来的视野开阔感,绝对值得所有的付出。
评分这本书给我带来的最深刻影响,并非知识上的增长,而是一种心境上的沉淀。它似乎在不经意间,解除了我对自己个人“成就”和“失败”的执念。作者似乎对世俗的评判标准抱着一种超然的、近乎慈悲的旁观态度。他谈论“目的性”时,那种语调,不是在教导,而是在引导你放下对“结果”的过度关注。阅读过程中,我的呼吸节奏都慢了下来,那种平日里总是紧绷着的、对未来不确定性的焦虑感,似乎被一种更广阔的视野所稀释了。我开始关注“存在”本身而非“达成什么”,这种转变是潜移默化的。它没有提供任何具体的行动指南,比如“明天早起冥想半小时”之类的建议,它的力量在于一种宏观的、形而上的“去语境化”。它把我们从社会强加给我们的角色和标签中暂时剥离出来,让你以一个更原始、更本质的状态去审视自己所处的“场域”。这种平静感,远比任何一剂强效的镇静剂都要持久和有效,它改变的不是你做了什么,而是你“如何看待”你所做的一切。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有