Table of Contents
1.1.Inferring Hamlet
2.2.Horatio
3.3.Plays within plays within plays
4.4.Two soliloquies
5.5.Ophelia
6.6.Shakespeare to the players
7.7. Themousetrap : contrary will
8.8.Gertrude
9.9.Claudius
10.10. Theimpostume
11.11. Thegrave-digger
12.12.Wonder-wounded hearers
13.13.In my heart there was a kind of fighting
14.14.We defy augury
15.15.Let it be
16.16.Apotheosis and tragedy
17.17.Hamlet and the high places
18.18.Fortinbras
19.19.Had I but time, o, I could tell you
20.20.Annihilation : Hamlet's wake
21.21. Thefusion of high and popular art
22.22.Hamlet as the limit of stage drama
23.23. Theend of our time
24.24. Thehero of consciousness
25.25.Hamlet and no end.
The Prince of Denmark, argues the eminent Bloom, was not much loved by his father the warrior king or by his mother, Queen Gertrude. Developing themes from his Shakespeare: Invention of the Human, Bloom adds that Hamlet was instead rather detached, moving through life rather like the lead in his own personal drama, giving a theatrical flair to moments such as the death of Polonius and aptly choosing a play to "catch the conscience of the king." The closest thing he ever had to a parent was Yorick the Jester, and his confrontation with Yorick's skull followed shortly by his attending Ophelia's funeral dealt a serious double blow to his indifference. It was then that he moves grimly toward the climax and his own death. Bloom generates any number of provocative themes, such as Hamlet's notions about plays and acting as reflecting Shakespeare's own rivalries with Ben Jonson, and that the prince never loved Ophelia. Some of the chapters are really too short to do justice to their topics, raising more questions than answers. Nor is the last third of the book, on the play's place in our cultural heritage, up to the parts that focus on its contents, though it features fewer off-putting attacks on political correctness than Bloom's more polemical works. Still, this is not a tyro's book; Bloom makes no concessions to readers who lack a deep familiarity with the play. Nor is it for any reader with a thin skin about Bloom's assumptions about the Anglo-European literary legacy. Short, sophisticated and opinionated, this is a thorny goodie for Bardolators and Bloomians.
Hard on the heels of his grand artistic survey, Genius: A Mosaic of One Hundred Exemplary Creative Minds [BKL S 1 02], Bloom returns to what he does best, the art of close reading, and offers a heartfelt and expert interpretation of Hamlet, Shakespeare's longest and most enigmatic play. Bloom, who unabashedly describes Shakespeare as his "mortal god," became dissatisfied with his treatment of Hamlet in his best-selling Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human (1998), hence this follow-up treatise devoted entirely to a work Bloom describes thusly: "Of all poems it is the most unlimited. As a meditation upon human fragility in confrontation with death, it competes only with the world's scriptures." A provocative and extravagant claim to be sure, one Bloom energetically and entertainingly substantiates in his lucid explication of the curious structure of this "overtly audience-aware" work and in his analysis of Hamlet himself, his oceanic consciousness, profound ambivalence, keen irony, and terrible psychic isolation. As Bloom parses this indelible creation, icon and "disturbance," he shares his exaltation, once again, over Shakespeare's genius and timeless vision.
Published in 1999, Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human provided a mammoth capstone to the career of one of the most important literary critics of our era. Though the book was called by some the most significant contribution to Shakespeare scholarship since the time of Dr. Johnson, Harold Bloom remained unsatisfied. He had devoted far too much of the chapter about the Bard's greatest work to questions regarding the play's origin, and "ruefully realized only later that most of what I thought and felt about Hamlet remained unsaid." Hamlet: Poem Unlimited, which he calls a "postlude" to Shakespeare, is an attempt to rectify this error. He sells himself short. A "postlude" sounds like a chatty wrap up, or a glorified appendix. Whereas here Bloom has distilled a life's passion for the centerpiece of his "secular scripture." "What was it in Shakespeare," an awestruck Bloom asks, "that broke free in Hamlet and in Hamlet?" Of course, there is no clear answer. But in Hamlet: Poem Unlimited Bloom, nonetheless, celebrates the question.
In his New York Times bestseller Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human, Harold Bloom showed us how Shakespeare shaped human consciousness and addressed the question of authorship in Hamlet. In Hamlet: Poem Unlimited, our most celebrated critic turns his attention to a reading of the play itself and to Shakespeare's most enigmatic and memorable character.
Hamlet: Poem Unlimited is Bloom's attempt to uncover the mystery of both Prince Hamlet and the play itself, how both prince and drama are able to break through the conventions of theatrical mimesis and the representation of character, making us question the very nature of theatrical illusion. In twenty-five brief chapters, Bloom takes us through the major soliloquies, scenes, characters, and action of the play, to explore the enigma at the heart of the drama, that is central to its universal appeal.
评分
评分
评分
评分
如果用现代的眼光去审视这部作品,你会发现它对于“人性弱点”的洞察力,完全超越了其诞生的时代。这不是一部写给特定历史时期的寓言,而是一部关于人类永恒困境的剧本。作者对“怀疑”这一主题的探讨是极其深入的。主角的每一次迟疑,都不是因为软弱,而是因为他试图用理性去对抗一个非理性的、充满欺骗的环境。这种对“确定性”的渴望与求而不得的痛苦,构成了阅读体验中最核心的情感张力。书中的幽默感,虽然时不时地闪现,但大多是黑色幽默,带有极强的讽刺性,它像一把冰冷的解剖刀,精准地切开了那些虚伪的表象。我尤其欣赏那些配角的塑造,他们并非脸谱化的工具人,每个人都有自己复杂的动机和局限性,他们共同构成了那个时代的众生相,也无意中成为了压垮主角的稻草。读完后,我感觉自己仿佛参与了一场盛大的心理实验,观察着不同个体在极端压力下的反应机制。这本书的价值在于,它让你不断地质疑自己内心的判断,并最终承认,在面对命运的洪流时,个人的力量是何其渺小。
评分坦白讲,这本书的阅读体验,更像是一场漫长而艰辛的智力攀登。它不是那种可以轻松消磨时间的休闲读物,它需要你投入全部的注意力去解码。我发现自己必须时不时地停下来,查阅一些历史背景或文化典故,才能真正跟上作者的思路。这部作品的魅力,在于它将个人的悲剧置于宏大的政治背景之下进行审视。我们看到的不仅仅是一个王子的困境,更是一个权力腐蚀人心、国家机器失衡的缩影。书中的政治权谋部分处理得极为高明,那些表面上的温文尔雅之下,隐藏着刀光剑影的较量。角色的行动往往不是出于单纯的善恶,而是被环境、血缘和义务等复杂因素所裹挟,这种灰色地带的描绘,远比非黑即白的叙事更具现实感。对于那些追求情节紧凑、叙事线索单一的读者来说,这本书或许会显得有些拖沓,因为它花了大量篇幅去描绘角色的内心波动和哲学思辨。但恰恰是这些“冗余”的篇幅,构筑了这个世界观的深度和厚度,让最终的爆发显得合情合理,无可避免。
评分这部作品,我得说,光是阅读的过程就足以让人感受到一股深沉的、近乎令人窒息的悲剧力量。它不仅仅是一个关于复仇的故事,更像是一面映照人性幽暗角落的镜子。作者对角色内心世界的刻画细致入微,尤其是主角那份挥之不去的犹豫与挣扎,简直是教科书级别的。我常常在想,如果换做是我,面对如此巨大的道德困境和家族宿命,是否能比他做得更好,答案是否定的。那种被责任压垮,却又无法彻底放下的矛盾感,通过精妙的对话和独白层层剥开,让人看得心惊肉跳。剧本的结构设计也极具匠心,每一幕的转折都像是精心布置的陷阱,将角色引向不可避免的结局。我特别欣赏那些看似无关紧要的场景,它们往往蕴含着关键的线索或深远的哲学意味,初读时或许会忽略,但回味起来,才惊觉其重要性。这部戏的舞台调度能力也极强,即使只是在脑海中构建场景,那座阴森的城堡、那些密布的阴影,都栩栩如生地浮现出来,营造出一种挥之不去的压抑氛围。整本书读下来,我需要时间来平复心情,因为它探讨的主题太过宏大和沉重,关乎生存、死亡、欺骗与真理,每一个字眼都带着重量。
评分这部作品的结构精妙得令人叹服,简直是一部文学建筑学的典范。它巧妙地运用了“戏中戏”的叙事手法,这种自我指涉的结构,不仅在情节上制造了高潮,更在主题上进行了深刻的自我反思——什么是真实?什么是表演?作者将舞台的虚构性与现实生活的残酷性并置,形成了一种强烈的反讽效果。我特别佩服作者对女性角色的塑造,她们虽然在父权社会中处于相对边缘的位置,但其存在对推动整个悲剧进程起到了至关重要的作用,她们的脆弱、她们的疯癫,都成为了解读男性世界失序的另一把钥匙。阅读过程中,我一直有一种强烈的代入感,尤其是在处理那些关于“行动”与“不行动”的辩证关系时。这种哲学层面的探讨,使得整本书的格局一下子被拉高了,不再局限于宫廷内部的恩怨情仇,而是上升到了对人类存在意义的追问。全书的意象运用也极为丰富,水、腐烂、瘟疫等反复出现的符号,共同编织了一张预示着毁灭的网,让读者在阅读的每一步都感受到一种宿命的沉重。
评分读完这本篇幅可观的文本,我最大的感受是,它的语言本身就是一种艺术形式,充满了古老而复杂的韵律感。那些长篇的独白,初看时可能会觉得晦涩难懂,充满了古英语的痕迹和复杂的句式结构,但这恰恰是其魅力所在。它要求读者放慢速度,甚至需要反复咀嚼那些措辞,才能真正体会到其中蕴含的深意和情感张力。我尤其喜欢那些充满隐喻的段落,它们像迷宫一样,引导你深入探索作者试图传达的更深层次的意义。例如,对梦境和疯狂的描绘,模糊了现实与虚幻的边界,让人不禁质疑自己所见所闻的真实性。不同角色之间的对话交锋,简直是一场语言的角斗,充满了机锋和试探,那种步步为营的心理战,比任何肢体冲突都更引人入胜。这本书的节奏控制得极好,在极度的紧张和偶尔出现的讽刺幽默之间找到了一个微妙的平衡点,使得长时间的阅读体验得以维持其吸引力。看完后,我忍不住去查阅了许多相关的学术评论,发现不同的解读角度千差万别,这恰恰说明了文本本身的丰富性和开放性,它拒绝给出唯一的答案,而是将诠释的权力交还给了读者。
评分一點有認同感是我也看不出所謂的Oedipus Complex,然後一些章節還是hmmm。(對於劇作本身的熟悉與大量閱讀近乎cliche的分析,認為一些問題是非常潛意識的理解,導致失去了那種出於直覺的creative misreading新鮮感,不一定對,但會使你學會提問題,這本書有點打通自己再度提問的能力。)
评分就像第四幕和第五幕之间的那个空白一样,虽然有时候太过跳跃,你又不能说大师的感觉不对,阐释的任务是留给我们这些小辈的。
评分Bloom is such a hopeless snob...
评分一點有認同感是我也看不出所謂的Oedipus Complex,然後一些章節還是hmmm。(對於劇作本身的熟悉與大量閱讀近乎cliche的分析,認為一些問題是非常潛意識的理解,導致失去了那種出於直覺的creative misreading新鮮感,不一定對,但會使你學會提問題,這本書有點打通自己再度提問的能力。)
评分Bloom is such a hopeless snob...
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有