From Publishers Weekly
The flood of numbers in the modern world often obscures more than enlightens, hence the demystifying classic How to Lie with Statistics and its progeny. But according to Boyle the problem is irremediable and fundamental. "[P]oliticians can't measure poverty, so they measure the number of people on welfare. Or they can't measure intelligence, so they measure exam results, or IQ. Doctors measure blood cells rather than health, and people all over the world measure money rather than love." Boyle revels in such broad indictments, damning entire professions for popular or politicized misperceptions, whose complex origins he reduces to numbers themselves and the influence of a few seminal figures Jeremy Bentham, Robert Malthus and Frederick Taylor primarily whose personal quirks loom far larger than the historical forces that shaped their thinking and made the world receptive to it. Boyle is more persuasive discussing Keynes and how his heuristic approach to macroeconomics became rigidified, undermining his original intentions, but even here he entirely ignores the political forces involved. Adding confusion, he occasionally approves some uses of numbers, calling for bringing "common sense to bear on the dead world of figures, so we can see patterns again," as if this wasn't the point of using numbers all along, from Pythagoras to Kepler to chaos theory. Chapters dealing with ethical investing, alternatives to conventional economic indicators and Edgar Cahn's "time dollars" further muddle matters. (June)Forecast: With a $50,000 promotional budget, the publisher plans national radio and TV campaign, national advertising, and a tie-in with author speaking engagements. But this title won't pose much competition for How to Lie with Statistics, still in print after all these years.
From Library Journal
Boyle, a writer and journalist specializing in economics, feels that much of our difficulty in understanding economic and sociological problems can be traced to our attempts to describe complex systems by simple statistics. He points out that since most things in real life are multifaceted, one must almost automatically fail when trying to reduce such things to a single number. He also makes the very good points that what we choose to count tells us more than the result of the count, that many of our measurements are inaccurate, and, most importantly, that the measuring process affects the very things that we are trying to understand. However, whether our failures result from statistical oversimplification that may be correctable or from the inherent impossibility of the task is debatable. Boyle's book features short biographies, interesting in their own right, of people like Robert Malthus and John Maynard Keynes who have helped move us in the direction of greater quantification. For academic and larger public libraries. Harold D. Shane, Baruch Coll., CUNY
Copyright 2001 Reed Business Information, Inc. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
评分
评分
评分
评分
坦白说,这本书对读者的要求不低,它需要你投入时间和精力去消化其中的复杂论点。如果你只是想找一本能让你快速获得几个“生活小窍门”的书,这本书可能不太适合。它更像是一场马拉松,需要你保持专注,跟随作者的思路穿越重重迷雾。然而,对于那些愿意付出努力的读者来说,回报是巨大的。读完之后,我发现自己对新闻标题的敏感度降低了,对那些夸张的“历史性突破”发言开始保持警惕,甚至在和朋友讨论投资机会时,我能更清晰地指出潜在的认知偏差点。这本书真正教会我的,不是如何变得更“理性”,而是如何更诚实地面对自己大脑中那些根深蒂固的、源于进化的“缺陷”。它提供了一个框架,一个评估世界复杂性的全新视角,让你在面对纷繁复杂的信息流时,能够更从容、更有底气地做出判断。这是一本值得反复阅读,并会在不同人生阶段带来新感悟的力作。
评分这本书的叙事节奏把握得相当到位,读起来丝毫没有那种枯燥乏味的感觉。我通常对这类主题的书籍很容易读不下去,但这一本却让我爱不释手,甚至有点像是读小说。作者巧妙地将历史案例、心理学实验和现代商业决策穿插在一起,形成了一个非常流畅的阅读体验。比如,他对“幸存者偏差”在商业分析中的应用进行了极为精彩的剖析,用几个截然不同的案例,从二战飞机的装甲问题到硅谷的创业神话,展示了同一认知陷阱如何以不同的面貌出现。我特别欣赏作者在论证过程中表现出的那种审慎态度,他不会轻易地下结论,而是引导读者自己去构建逻辑链条。这种“带着读者一起思考”的写作手法,极大地增强了代入感。更妙的是,每当我觉得自己快要完全理解一个复杂的概念时,作者总能抛出一个更具颠覆性的观点,让我不得不停下来,重新审视我原有的认知框架。这本书读完后,感觉自己的“思维肌肉”得到了极大的锻炼,不再是简单的信息接收者,而是变成了一个更具批判性的思考者。
评分这本书的封面设计简直让人眼前一亮,那种带着淡淡的复古感和现代极简主义的碰撞,一下子就抓住了我的注意力。拿到手里的时候,那种厚重感和纸张的质感也相当不错,看得出来作者和出版社在包装上是下足了功夫的。我当时是随便翻开一页,看到里面关于概率论在日常决策中的误用,立刻就被那种深入浅出的分析方式给吸引住了。作者的文字功底很扎实,他没有用那种高高在上的学术腔调,而是用非常贴近生活的例子,比如我们如何评估一次航班延误的风险,或者在超市面对促销活动时那种难以抑制的冲动。读起来一点都不费力,反而像是在和一个极其聪明的、有点幽默感的朋友聊天。特别是他对“锚定效应”的阐述,简直是醍醐灌顶,让我立刻反思了自己最近几次购物的冲动来源。这本书不仅仅是关于数字和逻辑,它更像是一面镜子,照出了我们在面对信息洪流时,内心深处那种不自觉的、近乎本能的非理性倾向。这种对人类心理的洞察力,才是这本书最宝贵的地方,它超越了单纯的科普范畴,触及了哲学和行为科学的交汇点。
评分这本书的语言风格有一种独特的魅力,它既有学者的严谨,又不失诗人的洞察力。作者善于运用一些富有画面感的比喻来阐释抽象的统计学概念,让原本冰冷的数字仿佛有了温度和生命。我特别喜欢他描述“不确定性”时的措辞,他没有将不确定性描绘成需要被消除的敌人,而是将其视为世界运行的底层逻辑,一种我们必须学会与之共存的自然状态。这种接受不确定性的哲学思想,贯穿了整本书的脉络,使得整部作品不仅仅是一本理性的分析工具书,更像是一部关于如何与一个充满随机性的世界和谐相处的“生活指南”。阅读过程中,我常常会停下来,不是因为不懂,而是因为被某个句子触动,需要时间去回味那种文字带来的哲学共鸣。这种将硬核的逻辑分析与人文关怀完美结合的能力,是许多同类书籍所欠缺的,也正是这本书能够脱颖而出的关键所在。
评分我得说,这本书的深度远远超出了我最初的预期。我原本以为这会是一本面向大众的、浅尝辄止的普及读物,但事实证明,它在某些章节的理论深度上,甚至可以和一些专业领域的入门教材相媲美。它没有回避那些晦涩难懂的数学模型,但处理得非常高明,通常是在提供直观解释之后,才引入必要的数学概念,而且这些概念的出现都是为了服务于更深层次的理解,而不是为了炫耀知识。对我个人而言,书中关于“信息瀑布”和“确认偏误”的交叉分析,尤其具有启发性。我们生活在一个信息爆炸的时代,但更可怕的是,我们越来越倾向于只摄取那些强化我们既有观点的“信息瀑布”。作者通过对社交媒体算法背后逻辑的揭示,将这种现象的后果量化,这种震撼感是纯粹的感性描述无法替代的。我甚至觉得,这本书可以作为一门关于“现代社会生存技能”的选修课教材,因为它教授的不是具体的技能,而是一种更高级别的认知防御机制。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有