圖書標籤: 法學  法哲學  思想史   

喜歡 Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence 的讀者還喜歡

三年前隻有我一個人標記，三年後還是如此。。。作者顯然同情包容性實證主義，但這場爭論已經快被大傢遺棄。對過程學派的描述最為細緻，隻是將實證主義和形式主義的關係顛倒過來，反倒認為前者是更大範疇，這令人略微驚訝。

第六章論述弱立場自然法理論會必然走入強立場自然法理論精妙而難懂。有空再看。理論史鮮明活潑，理解形式主義與實證主義、法律實證主義和社會學實證主義之間的差彆，很重要。

三年前隻有我一個人標記，三年後還是如此。。。作者顯然同情包容性實證主義，但這場爭論已經快被大傢遺棄。對過程學派的描述最為細緻，隻是將實證主義和形式主義的關係顛倒過來，反倒認為前者是更大範疇，這令人略微驚訝。

第六章論述弱立場自然法理論會必然走入強立場自然法理論精妙而難懂。有空再看。理論史鮮明活潑，理解形式主義與實證主義、法律實證主義和社會學實證主義之間的差彆，很重要。

三年前隻有我一個人標記，三年後還是如此。。。作者顯然同情包容性實證主義，但這場爭論已經快被大傢遺棄。對過程學派的描述最為細緻，隻是將實證主義和形式主義的關係顛倒過來，反倒認為前者是更大範疇，這令人略微驚訝。

Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence Anthony J. Sebok Cambridge University Press, 1998. Page2. The fact that the term legal positivism was rarely used before 1940,and probably never used before 1927,does not mean that the theoretical content of lega...

Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence Anthony J. Sebok Cambridge University Press, 1998. Page2. The fact that the term legal positivism was rarely used before 1940,and probably never used before 1927,does not mean that the theoretical content of lega...

Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence Anthony J. Sebok Cambridge University Press, 1998. Page2. The fact that the term legal positivism was rarely used before 1940,and probably never used before 1927,does not mean that the theoretical content of lega...

Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence Anthony J. Sebok Cambridge University Press, 1998. Page2. The fact that the term legal positivism was rarely used before 1940,and probably never used before 1927,does not mean that the theoretical content of lega...

Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence Anthony J. Sebok Cambridge University Press, 1998. Page2. The fact that the term legal positivism was rarely used before 1940,and probably never used before 1927,does not mean that the theoretical content of lega...