Contention, argument, and power have always been the tradition in American political talk. The author argues that any country that began in a revolution was bound to have this history. But the language of argument uses particular words with particular, sometimes shifting meanings, and to know what they are and what they meant over time is a critical contribution to political history. It is true that politicians may act as though they are part of no particular ideological tradition, but history shows that, more often that not, they use an understood meaning to enhance their actions.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
功用、自然權利、人民、政府、國傢、利益，六個概念串聯起的美國政治思想史。太過簡單抽象。
评分功用、自然權利、人民、政府、國傢、利益，六個概念串聯起的美國政治思想史。太過簡單抽象。
评分功用、自然權利、人民、政府、國傢、利益，六個概念串聯起的美國政治思想史。太過簡單抽象。
评分功用、自然權利、人民、政府、國傢、利益，六個概念串聯起的美國政治思想史。太過簡單抽象。
评分功用、自然權利、人民、政府、國傢、利益，六個概念串聯起的美國政治思想史。太過簡單抽象。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有