about the Clarendon Hume Edition:
The Clarendon Hume will include all of his works except his History of England and minor historical writings; it will be the only thorough critical edition, and will provide a far more extensive scholarly treatment than any previous editions. This edition (which has been in preparation since the 1970s) offers authoritative annotation, bibliographical information, and indexes, and draws upon the major advances in textual scholarship that have been made since the publication of earlier editions―advances both in the understanding of editorial principle and practice and in knowledge of the history of Hume's own texts.
General Editors: Professors T. L. Beauchamp (Georgetown University, USA), D. F. Norton (McGill University, Canada), M. A. Stewart (University of Lancaster, England).
The Edition will comprise:
Vols. 1 and 2: A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by D. F. Norton
Vol. 3: An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, edited by T. L. Beauchamp
Vol. 4: An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals, edited by T. L. Beauchamp
Vol. 5: The Natural History of Religion and the Dissertation on the Passions
Vols. 6 and 7: Essays
Vol. 8: Dialogues concerning Natural Religion and other posthumous publications, edited by M. A. Stewart
David and Mary Norton present the definitive scholarly edition of Hume's Treatise, one of the greatest philosophical works ever written. This set comprises the two volumes of texts and editorial material, which are also available for purchase separately.
不太容易看,不是那种能划出中心句的写法。枝杈和主线平铺着,有时候要反驳的作为靶子的观点也论证很久简直要被说服了。后来有些地方就没有跟着细抠了。觉得休谟这个人非常可爱,因为快乐乐观自然而然地善良的感觉。又像个爱钻牛角尖的理科男同学,越说越觉得自己太有道理啦。...
评分《人性论》书评:休谟的 “人性科学”。 全书分为三卷:第一卷“论知性”,是他的认识论:认识的来源只能是感觉经验—知识分两类,其中“一切关于事实的推理,似乎都建立在因果关系上”,而因果关系的基础归结于人的自然本性,把“最大的确定性和最严格的必然性”当做基于人性的...
评分导论即表示一切自然科学都是基于人的学科。因此将研究直指人之本身,即休谟的人性。而休谟认为这种认识人性的基础为经验和观察。 一卷,论知性。 一章论观念。知觉被休谟分为印象和观念,区别在于刺激心灵的强烈程度,但全部观念在初出现时都是来自简单印象(经验论,反驳了柏...
评分人性论(第一卷)笔记:对“论空间和时间观念”一章的解释 大家公认,心灵的能力是有限的,永远不能得到一个充分和恰当的无限概念。凡是无限可分割的东西必然含有无数的部分。如果可分割的东西用有限和特定的数目作部分,则该对象分割的过程就不可能无限进行下去,如此,无限...
评分休谟与现代哲学家不同,写作《人性论》时,用描述性语言,而非下定义方式阐述(现代哲学论著恰恰如此),文中充满不严谨,不确定,而这与他本人的哲学观点又相符的。 但是令人惊奇的是,他的描述让人觉得准确,恰如其分。 这是否由于语言本身的不严谨、不完备,反而抵消了文...
Brilliant work
评分Brilliant work
评分Brilliant work
评分Brilliant work
评分Brilliant work
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有